What is a white-label crypto wallet? It is a crypto-asset wallet whose technology and infrastructure come from a specialist provider, while a business offers it to its customers under its own brand. In its 2025 Report on White Labelling, the European Banking Authority (EBA) defines white labelling as a provider offering one or more financial products and services that are distributed and provided to customers under a partner’s brand. Applied to crypto wallets, customers see the business’s brand, while the provider handles the underlying key management, signing and blockchain connectivity.
How Is a White-Label Wallet Different from an In-House Wallet?
The difference lies in who builds the underlying technology: with an in-house wallet, the business develops its own key management and blockchain connectivity, whereas a white-label wallet uses the provider’s ready-made infrastructure. The steps to develop a white-label crypto wallet explains the work a business still needs to do after choosing white labelling. White labelling does not conflict with WaaS or embedded wallets; the difference between the three is that they correspond to branding, delivery model and product form respectively.
Which Businesses Are a Good Fit for a White-Label Crypto Wallet?
In its report, the EBA expects white labelling to become increasingly common in the crypto-asset space as well. Banks are a typical use case: how banks can offer crypto-asset services through white labelling covers the specific requirements in the EU and Hong Kong. In payments, white-label payment service providers breaks down the four layers of infrastructure involved.
What Should You Look for When Choosing a White-Label Crypto Wallet?
First, compliance responsibility does not transfer with outsourcing. Regulators in the EU, the UK, Singapore and Hong Kong all require the customer-facing institution to bear ultimate responsibility, and who is responsible for compliance when using a third-party wallet provider sets out the rules in each jurisdiction.
Second, the custody model determines who bears anti-money laundering obligations. Guidance from the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) considers most custodial wallet providers to be virtual asset service providers (VASPs), while developers that only build or sell unhosted wallet software generally are not; the key test is who controls the assets, not what the product is called. IOSCO likewise classifies arrangements in which the provider holds private keys or private key shards as custodial wallets. Businesses should therefore establish where the keys or key shards are held and whether the provider can move funds on its own. How to choose a secure Wallet-as-a-Service provider provides a complete evaluation checklist.
Conclusion
A white-label crypto wallet lets a business offer wallet services under its own brand without building the underlying technology itself. However, regulatory responsibility does not transfer with it, and the custody model also affects the business’s own compliance obligations, so key control and the division of responsibilities should be clarified when choosing a provider. Safeheron’s MPC Wallet-as-a-Service provides businesses with MPC key management and a policy engine.
Is your business considering launching a crypto wallet under its own brand?
Looking for a secure way to manage digital assets?
Talk to our experts and find the right solution for your business.
Request a DemoLooking for a secure way to manage digital assets?
Talk to our experts and find the right solution for your business.